Great Lakes Division teams decline 2013 US Open Cup berths as NPSL entries finalized

Posted on 09. Apr, 2013 by in NPSL

Thanks, but no thanks.

That was the sentiment expressed by a pair of Great Lakes Division teams from the National Premier Soccer League (NPSL) as they were offered a chance to represent the league in the 100th edition of the Lamar Hunt US Open Cup. The Erie Admirals, last year’s Great Lakes Division regular season champions, were expected to join the other five division winners from a year ago and the two spring tournament qualifiers from the Western Conference, but according to NPSL secretary and chairman of the NPSL Open Cup committee Joe Barone, they declined.

Erie owner John Moody said the decision was made due to a variety of reasons. First, the Admirals depend on college players to fill out their roster and many of them wouldn’t be able to join the team until the middle of May. And even if they could, there would be no time to practice or prepare for their opponent.

“It’s important to respect the game … the tournament and our opponents and we felt putting out a ‘B-team’ wouldn’t be fair,” said Moody.

He also cited the financial burden of taking part in the Open Cup, especially in terms of making travel arrangements on relatively short notice. As it stands, when the draw is announced at the end of April, his team could be chosen to play the Colorado Rovers of the USSSA, or the Northern California-based US Club Soccer team in the Play-In Round on May 7. If the draw doesn’t go their way, they could travel to that game. As of last year, the US Soccer Federation reimburses up to $8,000 in travel costs, but depending on where they have to travel, that money can be eaten up rather quickly. On the other side, according to Moody, if they had to host, that would also be a challenge for his club because they would have difficulty securing a local venue. Not to mention, there is a cost to hosting as well. Most teams have to pay to rent a field, pay the referees, and coordinate gameday efforts, just to name a few of the primary expenses.

“We would love to take part in this great tournament … but there’s just too many unknowns for a club like ours,” he added.

With the division’s regular season champions out of the running, AFC Cleveland was next in line as the division’s playoff champions. Detroit City FC had finished ahead of Cleveland in the regular season standings by a point, but when the two teams squared off in the playoffs, Cleveland won 2-1, and the defeated Erie in penalty kicks in the division final.

But just like the Admirals before them, Cleveland also turned down the opportunity to play in the 2013 US Open Cup. The second-year club also cited player availability as their main reason for turning down the invitation.

“AFC Cleveland really wanted to participate in such a historic tournament, but scheduling issues during that time made this an impossible task,” said Cleveland chairman Terry Lawriw.

After the top two teams from the Midwest Conference declined, NPSL management decided that rather than giving an Open Cup berth to the division’s third choice (Detroit City FC), they would award the berth to the club that had the best overall record among the remaining teams league wide (excluding Western Conference), which – coincidentally – ended up being the Brooklyn Italians, a team that Barone has worked for over the last two decades.

The Italians will join the Georgia Revolution (Southeast Division playoff finalist) and Atlantic Division winners New York Red Bulls NPSL to complete the eight team NPSL field for the 2013 tournament.

The five remaining NPSL clubs include: Western Conference qualifying winners FC Hasental and Sacramento Gold, as well as the Madison 56ers (Central Division champions), Chattanooga FC (Southeast Division playoff champion) and FC Lehigh Valley United Sonic (Keystone Division champions).

TheCup.us has also confirmed that the NPSL is no long guaranteeing spots in the First Round of the 2013 US Open Cup to particular clubs or regions.

It was originally reported that the Madison 56ers, Chattanooga FC, FC Lehigh Valley United Sonic, and the two Western Conference winners (FC Hasental and Sacramento Gold) would begin play in Round 1 of the US Open Cup. Of the remaining three teams, which had yet to be determined, two of them would begin in the Play-In Round against either the US Club Soccer or the USSSA champion.

Now, the two Play-In Round teams won’t be known until the US Soccer Federation unveils the 2013 US Open Cup draw at the end of April. It is expected that the teams will be ones that are located closest to the Northern California-based US Club Soccer representative and the Colorado Rovers of the USSSA in an effort to minimize travel costs.

2013 NPSL entries in Lamar Hunt US Open Cup (8 teams)

Brooklyn Italians
Chattanooga FC
FC Hasental
FC Lehigh Valley United Sonic
Georgia Revolution
Madison 56ers
New York Red Bulls U23s
Sacramento Gold

* 2 teams (still TBD) will begin play in Play-In Round

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

17 Responses to “Great Lakes Division teams decline 2013 US Open Cup berths as NPSL entries finalized”

  1. jerichowhiskey 9 April 2013 at 9:51 am #

    Certainly feels a touch of cronyism there. It could be easily justified for RBNY being chosen since they’re #1 at 33 points for the Atlantic conference, but Detroit FC should’ve still been allowed to represent the Great Lakes conference instead of Brooklyn Italians.

  2. El Conductor 9 April 2013 at 11:10 am #

    Not guaranteeing any first round spots to specific NPSL clubs is the only sensible thing the Open Cup could do after painting themselves in a corner with those play-in round match-ups.

    I expect the two California clubs (or possibly Madison) will be in the play-in round since those are the three closest clubs to the play-in opponents.

  3. T. A. Simeria 9 April 2013 at 11:47 am #

    It’s sad that the current format of the Open Cup makes it virtually impossible for some clubs to participate. Perhaps something can be done in the future to correct that.

  4. WAMPUS 9 April 2013 at 1:05 pm #

    Point of Order… AFC Cleveland, by virtue of the end-of-season tournament were the 2012 NPSL Midwest-Great Lakes Champions, not the Erie Admirals…

    While the Admirals did finish the season at the top of the division table, they were not the Champions… were this the MLS, they would have the division’s Supporter’s Shield… but it’s not so they get NOTHING.

  5. WAMPUS 9 April 2013 at 2:06 pm #

    Cleveland were the Division Champs… not Erie… otherwise good article. #WAMPUS

  6. Joe Evans 9 April 2013 at 2:12 pm #

    Since when were the Georgia Revolution the Southeast Division Champions? I believe Chattanooga FC were.

  7. Josh Hakala 9 April 2013 at 3:47 pm #

    You’ll have to forgive the confusion but turns out the 2012 standings on the league’s website were wrong (and have been wrong apparently since the season ended). For some reason playoff results were lumped in with regular season results, so thats why division champs were mixed up.

  8. El Conductor 9 April 2013 at 5:06 pm #

    Joe, I think the confusion is partly the league’s fault. They switch the terminology of “regions” “divisions” and “conferences” every year, so Georgia was a “division” winner per last year’s terminology… just not the “region” champion.

  9. Josh Hakala 9 April 2013 at 5:23 pm #

    Agreed. The terminology is extremely challenging. In every sport that I’m aware of, there are CONFERENCES, and then DIVISIONS within those conferences. I’ve been going by that terminology despite what it says on the league website. In fact, I was told by a team official that the standings were incorrectly laid out when they were constructed and no one has bothered to fix them. But yet, despite that, teams continue to use the wrong CONFERENCES/DIVISIONS terminology.

    And the fact that every conference/division has their own way of determining champions/playoffs etc. It makes it extremely hard for people (and especially the handful of media who are trying to cover it) to follow.

  10. Daniel Feuerstein 9 April 2013 at 6:04 pm #

    Shame that Detroit City FC won’t be allowed to participate. Tavio told me about them and I hoped they would enter this edition.

    Hopefully they will be motivated for 2014 and win their division/conference this season.

  11. Gerald Barnhart 9 April 2013 at 6:22 pm #

    T. A. Simeria: The format of the tournament is not the true source of the problem for the amateur teams. It is the collegiate availability dates set by the NCAA and, of course, personal player conflicts (class or work), which will always be the case for amateur clubs.

    It also does not help that the NPSL every year waits to establish criteria for who qualifies until after the new year instead of predetermining it so teams can plan accordingly.

  12. Dave Hogg 9 April 2013 at 8:41 pm #

    Shame that Detroit City FC didn’t get a shot – I’m still waiting for the DCFC-Bucks game.

  13. Eric Anderson 9 April 2013 at 11:13 pm #

    El Conductor: The Madison 56ers’ general manager told me he has confirmation from the USSF that they will play in the first round.

  14. Jim F 9 April 2013 at 11:37 pm #

    I doubt the Bucks management would want to admit that DCFC exists. I haven’t seen rosters for 2013 yet, but I know last year it would have been problematic with folks like Stefan St. Louis playing on both clubs.

  15. Josh Hakala 10 April 2013 at 12:06 am #

    The Bucks were aware of him playing for both clubs and I don’t think anyone had a problem with it. In fact, he may have even been “on loan”

  16. Frank 10 April 2013 at 8:32 am #

    To throw more confusion into the Detroit area lower level soccer arena.. Bucks star player Tommy Catalano now plays for upstart FC Sparta in DCFC’s league.

  17. Josh Hakala 10 April 2013 at 11:54 am #

    Well, we don’t know that for sure. He was on Sparta’s tryout list. I never got confirmation that he actually participated or was just invited. I would be surprised if he played for them, honestly. He’ll be playing in the pros soon, I’m sure.


Leave a Reply

Please fill the required box or you can’t comment at all. Please use kind words. Your e-mail address will not be published.

Gravatar is supported.

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>